Kentucky considering roadside driver drug tests

Mike Wynn, @MikeWynn_CJ 11:54 p.m. EDT September 16, 2015

DSC_0161

Above:  Schwendau, assistant director of Highway Safety Programs.

Right now, officials are only testing the kits for accuracy and reliability, administering them to volunteers after an arrest is complete. If they prove reliable, lawmakers say they will consider legislation next year to expand their use as a common part of police work.

Schwendau says police might soon use the swab kits in the same way they rely on roadside breath tests to identify drunken drivers, adding one more step to “remove that question of doubt” during a traffic stop.

Defense attorneys are more skeptical, warning that the tests could lead to invasive searches or give officers false pretense for arrests.

“They are chipping away at our rights — I just don’t know how else to put it,” said Larry “The DUI Guy” Forman, an attorney in Louisville who specializes in impaired driving cases.

Damon Preston, deputy public advocate at the Department of Public Advocacy, cautions that the courts still need to determine the reliability of the kits and what circumstances warrant their use in the field.

“The ease or simplicity of a sobriety test should never infringe upon the rights of persons to be free from unwarranted or invasive searches of their bodies,” he said.

The side of safety

The swabs don’t show a person’s level of impairment — only that drugs are present in their system. Supporters say Kentucky law would not allow them as evidence in court, and to build a case, police would still rely on the same process they currently use in investigations.

That typically involves a field sobriety test followed by an evaluation from a drug recognition expert, who is trained to monitor the suspect’s behavior and physical condition to determine their level of intoxication. Police also collect blood samples, which are much more conclusive.

Schwendau said the roadside tests could help police narrow down which drugs to test for in a blood sample. He said the kits already have proved successful in other states, particularity in California where authorities have upped the ante with digital devices precise enough to provide court evidence. That has saved the state money in the long run because more suspects are pleading out cases, he said.

On his website, Forman advises people to refuse field sobriety tests and breathalyzers to improve their chances of a successful defense in court. If swabs become commonplace in Kentucky, Forman says, drivers should refuse them as well.

One problem, he argues, could occur when people use drugs earlier in the day but are pulled over after the effects have worn off. He cited concerns that the swab could still test positive even though a driver is no longer under the influence.

Forman also questions how variations in temperature or allowing kits to sit in a hot police car for long periods might affect the results.

“It just gets really, really hairy, really fast,” he said.

But Schwendau points out that drivers who are not impaired will be vindicated in later tests. He also worries that while most people know it’s wrong to get behind the wheel drunk, many still think it’s OK to take an extra prescription pill before driving.

“We are doing it to save lives and get risks off the road,” he said. For police, “the best decision I think always is to err on the side of safety.”

Deadly risks

According to Kentucky State Police, authorities suspected that drugs were a factor in nearly 1,600 traffic collisions across the state last year, resulting in 939 injuries and 214 deaths.

In some areas struggling with epidemic drug abuse, high drivers are more common than drunken drivers, according to Van Ingram, head of the Office of Drug Control Policy. A lot of areas are having problems with drivers who are intoxicated on both drugs and alcohol, he said.

House Judiciary Chairman John Tilley, D-Hopkinsville, said lawmakers will want to look at the highway safety office’s pilot project before putting forth any legislation. Still, he reasons that the swabs also could help exclude drivers who might otherwise fall suspect because they swerved accidentally.

Officials have distributed 100 kits for the pilot tests, which they hope to wrap up in October.

Schwendau said he will bring the results to a state task force on impaired driving along with the Governor’s Executive Committee on Highway Safety.

Even if the kits are approved and adopted, police face a cost of $7 per unit.

Schwendau said local communities would have to choose whether to use them since the kits are too expensive for the state to provide. But departments could apply for federal grants, he said.

“It’s not our place to force it on them,” Schwendau said. “We just want to offer them a better tool.”

Reporter Mike Wynn can be reached at (502) 875-5136. Follow him on Twitter at @MikeWynn_CJ.

CONTINUE READING…

Advertisements

One Reply to “Kentucky considering roadside driver drug tests”

  1. Red VanWinkle
    3 hrs ·

    This was on my feeds this morning and I should address this for Kentucky Cannabis consumers, and Cannabis consumers traveling in KY.
    This spells bad news for Kentucky Cannabis consumers. This spells bad news for anyone from legal Marijuana states traveling in Ky.

    The KY law on DUI with Cannabis being the contributing factor.
    Note (1)
    (c) While under the influence of any other substance or combination of substances which impairs one’s driving ability;
    (d) While the presence of a controlled substance listed in subsection (12) of this section is detected in the blood, as measured by a scientifically reliable test, or tests, taken within two (2) hours of cessation of operation or physical control of a motor vehicle
    Subsection (12) The substances applicable to a prosecution under subsection (1)(d) of this section are: (a) Any Schedule I controlled substance except MARIJUANA; (b) Alprazolam; (c) Amphetamine; (d) Buprenorphine; (e) Butalbital; (f) Carisoprodol; (g) Cocaine; (h) Diazepam; (i) Hydrocodone; (j) Meprobamate; (k) Methadone; (l) Methamphetamine; (m) Oxycodone; (n) Promethazine; (o) Propoxyphene; and (p) Zolpidem.
    So KY law concerning Cannabis (marijuana) consumers and driving are currently right. As Cannabis only causes a “buzz” for a coupe of hours, yet can test positive for Marijuana for up to 30 day. So the need for Marijuana to affect a person’s driving is correct. Not just a simple test positive. Which means if these test include Marijuana, only abuse can occur.

    Now here is the problem. An officer can easily profile a person with test in hand. They could profile anyone from a medical, or recreational Marijuana state. They could profile young people. They could profile minorities. They could profile anyone they wish. Then if the person test positive, the officer could easily say they seen erratic driving, as reason for the test. Could use the test results to allow unjust searches.
    If this occurs, there will be a huge jump in Marijuana DUI arrest. Which in many cases the driver will be completely sober. Because a large percentage of people are Cannabis consumers. This will be an arrest cash cow. This will continue, until the wrong person is arrested, and sues the state of Kentucky.

    KY Senator Gerald Neal, Senator Perry B. Clark , Senator Denise Harper Angel-Dreisbach, Senator Dennis Parrett, Senator C.b. Embry . Can you Legislators see the issue with how this road side drug test can create issues for tourism, and profiling? Can you see sober drivers convicted unjustly if Marijuana is one of the substances the test is used for? I encourage each of you to address the 30 day time period where Marijuana can test positive, if this legislation moves forward.

    My advise to all drivers, is to simply refuse the currently voluntary mouth swab drug test. Special attention to those driving in Louisville, Paducah and Madison County.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s